Change of governements without change in governance

A look at the post-poll situation in Maharashtra, with a slightly different perspective:

•  We have all forgotten that in democracy people directly or indirectly through their representatives administer the country. Do the elected MLAs represent people or their parties ? Is election merely about selecting between parties ? The battle between foot-soldiers and shatraps of the parties to be become 'rulers' is no different than battle for supremacy between hundreds of kings who ruled the masses, before independence.

• Since, independence the population has tripled, but the number of representatives, has not increased commensurately. The 'winner-takes-all' approach to government formation needs to be reworked out.

•  Most Indians study not for learning, but to score marks in exams, higher marks means greater job opportunities. Similarly, political parties don't care about governance, but only about the number of seats, more seats mean more power.

•  Lets compare the situation with, AAP in Delhi. When activists raised uncomfortable questions and made demands in public interests, they were not respected but rather challenged into electoral politics. Some of them formed a party and came second in the race. Despite not being in majority, citing moral victory and shying away from majority, they were pushed to enter government formation and show majority by BJP and Congress. But they came up with novel ideas like referendum and 16-point agenda for support. When it came to passing the reform for which they were pulled into politics, BJP and Congress teamed up to block them. If AAP had continued without passing their legislation - it would have been betrayal of trust of the people who voted for them, if they resign they (which they did), they would be labelled as running away from government. Elections were denied for eight months subsequently in the name of some sacrosanct letters and replies.

• Like AAP many political parties, including BJP, in India rose with some specific regional / ideological demands. Initial volunteers of such new born parties are idealistic but this race for the majority leads them to paths on which principles are compromised. The emphatic "naahi-naahi-naahi" of dynamic Devendra Fadnavis to alliance with NCP or PM Modi's criticism of NCP on the corruption charges against them, (before the elections) raise peoples hopes and when they compromise principles to remain in power (after the elections), hopes crash even faster. Vajpayee's clean image, had raised people's expectations, but when they saw mediocre performance, "feel-good-factor" was nowhere to be seen and UPA came to power. Anger against UPA's corruption scams, brought BJP back in power. Such flip-flops are seen at state and district level as well. So are we addressing the real problems ? Are we asking the right questions ? Our political analysts always concentrate on political battles, vote-banks and vote-shares based on religion, castes and communities and number of seats, but not the fundamental problems with the electoral system in India. I wish, we are more serious about change in governance, rather than a mere change in government. 

Political Inertia

I have been following Indian politics for close to 20 years now, and one thing that irks me the most is the inertia that exists in the system.  In the first quarter of the 21st century, we are witnessing exciting things - technology is becoming affordable, autocratic regimes are falling,  new economies are emerging, bipolar or unipolar superpower regimes are falling apart,  as people across cultures are getting connected  interdependence between nations is increasing. In times like this, a country whose median age group falls in the 20s has unparalleled advantage. Yet political system in India is struggling to tap the potential which is waiting to explode.

Youth have taken to the street - demanding justice, laws, opportunities. The protests for Janlokpal, Delhi gang rape and many others are manifestation of the desire to bring about a change in the system. However,  our so called leaders executive,  judicial, bureaucratic and political class are procrastinating on the decisions they need to take.  They will wait until things dampen out and subside.  A leader, by definition is one who can inspire people to follow his path or ideas.  Where are the leaders who can mobilize masses ? A leader in a democracy certainly does not hide in a fortress behind barricades and police force or struggle to read scripted speeches addressing orchestrated crowds.  In 2014 elections, these people must be overthrown from their seats of power.

Many of these so called leaders are octogenarian, either in their age or ideologies.  Their priority is satisfy their greed for money, power, luxuries -- they have no interest in welfare of the society. Consequently, overall result is a status quo.  Take the case of hanging terrorists. The decisions were delayed to the point beyond which they could not be delayed further. The fall out reactions were also exactly as predicted. The pseudo secularists or communal nationalists, leftists, regional parties have shown their usual reactions, aimed at appeasing their respective vote-banks. The so-called human rights activists, were conveniently hibernating when innocent citizens died in blasts and attacks occurring every year, in some part of the country. When a deterrent punishment was pronounced, as expected, these lobbies they become vociferous, as if terrorists are the only humans in this country.  The media and particularly journalists pretended to be independent and liberal - but as they are bound by their commercial or political affiliations or government jobs -- they launched veiled attacks on the other side.  The judicial system worked at its own pace - their is no concept of time for them - if you get justice in your lifetime, you must be lucky. Bureaucracy, well known for red-tapism, sycophancy and corrupt practices, only helped to make matters worse in this case. Ironically, the separatists / terrorists are also becoming predicatable;  a locality in Mumbai has been targeted thrice since 1993.

We need great force, to bring a change in the momentum of the system which will continue to be in a state otherwise.  Fundamental changes need to be brought in electoral, judicial processes. We need laws to be reworked, systems to be made more participative.  Democracy is not just about casting your vote; it is about a society which can think, and act in a collective and timely manner for welfare of everyone.  We are fortunate that we are entering an era where communication is getting faster and better with research in science and technology.  A truly participative governance is certainly feasible, if we embrace technology.  If India aspires to be progressive and successful, she needs to overcome the inertia and unleash the latent potential. We need to believe in ourselves more than we believe our ancestors and their beliefs about god and the world. Dynasties and caste systems need to be broken. Existing orders need to be challenged. The only thing constant in life is change !

आज की राजनीति

आज राजनीति में महात्मा की ज़रुरत हैं, या कुटिल चाणाक्य की ?
रावण अनेक हों तो, राम की आवश्यकता हैं, या परशुराम की ?

Kabeer Vacanaavali

Some dohas (couplets) of Kabeer that I learnt in school:

तिनका कबहुँ ना निंदये, जो पाँव तले होय ।
कबहुँ उड़ आँखो पड़े, पीर घानेरी होय ॥

बडा हुआ तो क्या हुआ जैसे पेड़ खजूर।
पंथी को छाया नही फल लागे अति दूर ॥

कबीरा गर्व न कीजिये काल गहे कर केस
ना जाने कित मारे हैं क्या घर क्या परदेस

जाति न पूछो साधु की, पूछ लीजिये ज्ञान।
मोल करो तलवार का, पड़ा रहने दो म्यान।।

Rangeele

A beautiful composition by Naresh, Paresh and Kailash! I always wonder how they manage to capture myriad emotions like joy, sorrow, anxiety, agony, aspirations, desires, love, anger of ordinary people. There are many musicians who have mastered all ragas and genres, yet, unlike Kailasa, very few can manage to stir your soul, perhaps because their life is devoid of experiences of struggle, hardships and failures.

Indian knowledge based economy

The reality of Indian knowledge based society is: entrepreneurs = money hungry and power thirsty manipulators, managers = contractors and engineers = job-security seeking laborers. Knowledge based society and IT superpower is absolute ignorance. Open your eyes to reality, India is only a servile labor exporter. Is it wrong to be a laborer ? No. What is incorrect is being exploited as a laborer. What have we achieved with the service based model employed in the last 30 years ? Few lakh people could get food and homes, and the wealth of few business dynastic families have swelled by billions of times but India is a nation of 100 crore people. Without any intellectual capital, we will not be able to prosper in the long run. Firstly, cheaper and more efficient economies are on the rise and they have the potential to displace our IT workforce, and in this situation the dynastic business houses will quickly shift their money to a more profitable ventures leaving the employees to the same plight as that of the cotton-mill workers in Mumbai. Secondly, despite having a workforce of the order of 1.5 lakhs, these IT giants can not come up with innovative products and inventions whereas small companies of 100 people in smaller countries are coming up with game-changer products. As a direct consequence of this everyone in Indian IT industry is looked upon as a servile laborer, to whom you can outsource laborious bug-fixing, testing or support work. But more important than this perception is the fact that these companies are not producing any solutions to the problems that our country faces -- every technology is imported which increases the cost and hence the overall burden on the economy.  The mark of a good society is one which one practices the values that it preaches -- and we as a nation have a long way to go to achieve that !

Right to recall

Few questions to those who are rejecting the idea of right to recall as foolish and impractical. 

Here are few arguments made to dismiss the idea and my counter-arguments to them:

Right to recall will lead to political instability - 

If this is a mechanism to recall corrupt politicians. No political party ever admits that majority of their party members are corrupt. Then what is the problem ? We should not have any problem, if say, only 1% of the candidates are recalled and replaced every two years. One-third of the Rajya Sabha members retire every two years. It does not lead to instability. [ We will come to issue of elections later.] Saying that right to recall will lead to political instability is indirectly stating that majority of the politicians in India are and will be corrupt.

Right to Recall will become a weapon in the hands of losers to find a subterfuge way of defeating the winner - 

You are assuming that we can only build system which can be misused. The subterfuge could happen in the elections as well. If you can guarantee that no rigging happens in the elections, you should also be able to guarantee that no rigging happens in a procedure which is as important as the elections. You have to. That is your job, is n't it ? Secondly, in a democracy a person can be elected or voted out only if majority of people think so. So, majority of the voters have to express their dissent. In a country where elections are skipped for vacations, it is very unlikely that majority of the people would go to reject a candidate unless they are totally frustrated. Thirdly, if voters are believed to be capable of choosing right candidates, we can also trust their judgement of rejecting corrupt ones. 

Who will verify signatures ?

Why are we talking of signatures ? Are we not capable of building an electronic system ? It is not as complex as rocket science. We can launch satellites, send rockets to moon build nuclear plants. Then why not a computer based system for elections ? We have a post office in every village, town or district of our country. Percentage of these running without electricity should be very less. We can install computers / devices here for the purpose of registering recall votes. A citizen can walk into these centers anytime and register his dissent. At the end of specific period say 1 year or 2 year, these votes can be counted. Internet based services can be used as well. Internet banking has now become common in large cities. Many of our IT companies specialize in creating web based solutions. 

Cost of elections

What is the exact expenditure on elections, by-elections, state elections, municipal elections ? To whom is it costly -- for the election commission or the political parties who invest lot of money in winning them ?  EVMs are not changed for years, teachers and schools are always available for free. Nevertheless, if we make recalling  a permanent system powered by electronic means we can cut down the cost.

At the end, I would only like to say that we can improve any system only if we are optimistic to find solutions to problems rather than being pessimistic and discouraging those who are eager to bring about change. I certainly believe that we can change our electoral system, so that it reflects the aspirations of  billion people rather than few power hungry people - like it is today.